Babst Calland’s litigation attorneys provide cost-effective and practical representation for clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to locally-owned and operated businesses. Our attorneys have significant experience trying cases to verdict in both state and federal courts, with particular experience in the courts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio.
The litigation attorneys at Babst Calland develop a deep understanding of our clients’ businesses and interests, and are therefore able to guide our clients through the litigation process intelligently. We provide focused representation designed to meet our clients’ overall business goals, whether that means positioning a dispute for favorable settlement or litigating it to the fullest extent necessary. When appropriate, Babst Calland’s litigation attorneys also offer the distinct advantage of being able to team with regulatory and other non-litigation attorneys within the firm who can offer an additional depth of legal, scientific and engineering knowledge, which uniquely positions Babst Calland to efficiently and effectively advocate for our clients.
Babst Calland’s litigation attorneys also have broad-ranging appellate experience and are committed to serving our clients’ needs from the beginning of a controversy through the completion of the appellate process. In addition, we are experienced at handling appeals for matters that were handled by others at the trial level. Our attorneys use their experience and knowledge of appellate trends to help our clients realistically assess their prospects on appeal, conduct the cost-benefit analysis of pursuing an appeal, and wisely select the discrete issues to pursue on appeal. Our attorneys have successfully handled appeals for our clients in the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals, state supreme courts, state intermediate appellate courts, and administrative tribunals.
Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Non-Compete Agreements: Key Updates and Implications for Pa. Employers
The Legal Intelligencer
(by Steve Antonelli and Alex Farone)
Changes in the world of non-competition agreements (“non-competes”) have been particularly prevalent in recent weeks, most notably including court activity barring the Federal Trade Commission’s new non-compete ban and Pennsylvania’s new law restricting the use of certain non-competes for healthcare practitioners. …
Navigate the Current Uncertainty on FinCEN Matters
Firm Alert
UPDATE: Babst Calland Stands Ready to Advise All Clients on FinCEN Matters
(by Chris Farmakis, Susanna Bagdasarova, Kate Cooper, and Dane Fennell)
Following up on our May 2024 Alert, Babst Calland would like to remind you of the upcoming January 1, 2025 compliance deadline for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Rule (the “Rule”). …
Stare Decisis: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Willingness to Overturn Longstanding Precedent and Its Potential Effect on State Appellate Courts
The Legal Intelligencer
(by Casey Alan Coyle and Michael Libuser)
Courts have long extolled the benefits of stare decisis, saying that it “promotes the evenhanded, predictable, and consistent development of legal principles, fosters reliance on judicial decisions, and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process.” Payne v. …
Two Babst Calland Attorneys Named as 2025 Best Lawyers in America® “Lawyer of the Year”, 40 Selected for Inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America®, and 17 Named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America
Babst Calland is pleased to announce that two lawyers were selected as 2025 Best Lawyers in America® “Lawyer of the Year” in Pittsburgh, Pa. and Charleston, W. …
Don’t Bank on It: Recovering Expenses for Motions to Compel Discovery
Pretrial Practice & Discovery
American Bar Association Litigation Section
(by Michael Libuser)
“Discovery sanctions serve the objectives of discovery by correcting for the adverse effects of discovery violations and deterring future discovery violations from occurring.” Taylor v. …
Legal Experts to Lay Out Recent SCOTUS Decisions’ Impact on Business
The Current (PA Chamber Business Blog)
(by Christina Manfredi McKinley)
On July 31, 2024, the Pennsylvania Chamber will offer a free webinar addressing the effect on the business community of three significant administrative law cases from the Supreme Court’s recently concluded term: Loper Bright, Corner Post, and Ohio v. …
In Memoriam: The Modern Administrative State (1984-2024)
Law360
(by Joseph Schaeffer and Jessica Deyoe)
On June 28, 2024, the modern administrative state died with the United States Supreme Court’s overruling of Chevron U.S.A. …
U.S. Supreme Court Issues Three Decisions Charting New Path for Federal Administrative Law
Firm Alert
Chevron is overruled; right to jury trial in many agency enforcement actions is guaranteed; and claim accrual date for Administrative Procedure Act claims are fixed. …
Supreme Court of Appeals Addresses Burden of Proof in Design-Defect Products Liability Cases
Litigation Alert
(by Joseph Schaeffer and Mychal Schulz)
Last week, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia addressed two long-standing issues under West Virginia products liability law: (1) must a plaintiff asserting a strict liability design-defect claim prove the existence of an alternative, feasible design, and, (2) if so, must the alternative, feasible design eliminate the risk of the specific injury suffered by the plaintiff? …
Blurred Lines: The Ongoing Battle Between iLottery and iGaming
The Legal Intelligencer
(by Casey Alan Coyle and Michael Libuser)
Online gaming is a booming industry. …
